I wanted badly to believe that news didn’t die, even when it was beaten back for so many years.
- Ronan Farrow(From his book Catch and Kill)
If my hero, Jaqueline Montalvo, lived to testify what would she be able to provide the court? and potentially to the public? I can only surmise.
I can guess that she could attest that Nick Kroll and Tig Notaro were lying about what occurred on April 29th 2008. She told Alissa Malzman Sterling very little according to careerist Malzman. Montalvo told her " I will say that no crime was committed that night and that is why I didn't even make an incident report." Sounds good for me but pretty bad for Nick Kroll, Tig Notaro, and more importantly, John Gregozek and his very odd acting elite unit.
During trial, I saw a statement made by Nick Kroll to the prosecutors(which I was never given in discovery, after the trial) where he alleged all sorts of mayhem, that there was beer bottles in our car???? So many more ugly lies that I can't stand even thinking about. All false and guess what? Nick Kroll was never there at all. Notaro had also invented a Sherrif arriving and sneaking her in a side door. Turned out there was no Sherrif and no side door at the Imrpov. Won't even get into the lawless behavior of judges, Jessner, Maria Stratton, Vanderet, Karla Kerlin, Mary Lou Villar, Martinez and more. And the prosecutors... all five of them(??!!) again, lawless. All this could have come out if Montalvo lived to testify.
Prospectively, it could be very bad for a whole lot of powerful people.
You see Gregozek was not working for the people in my case but for fixers like Martin Dori Singer and Jules B. Kroll. Due to me fighting this every step of the way he had now cost the taxpayers a fortune on this increasingly malicious prosecution.
It could get even worse for him and his very special Stalking unit(TMU) if I prevailed at trial. If I prevailed I could sue for millions. That is if the fix was not in the civil courts. Turned out it was but let's go back to the criminal case. It could be covered in the press that this cop and some of his fellow elite unit members were trying to railroad a law-abiding citizen. Someone with power might do some digging and conclude what I'd concluded. He was working for Marty Singer and Jules Kroll. I found out later the whole unit was corrupted. Anyone doing a little digging would find out that Nick Kroll was behind it and his aspirations to fame would be compromised, at the very least.
But it was more than money or press coverage that would have concerned John Gregozek.
Gregozek had committed a series of serious crimes in the course of this malicious prosecution. He had fudged police reports and he had committed perjury on many occasions. He had repeatedly lied under oath in search warrant after search warrant. He had drawn up exigent circumstance warrants on three occasions. That makes no sense in any legal way. He was behaving with no consideration to the law. And judge after judge gave him and the prosecution anything they wanted until I got the miracle that was trial judge, Judge Randolph Moore.
Gregozek had fabricated an incident report number and claimed that this was the number Jaqueline Montalo assigned the report. In fact, there was not just not a number but there was no report at all. Gregozek had also written in a report and the search warrants that police showed up to another occasion and that too proved to be a lie. No 911 call exists for that date and time or alleged incident. I won't even get into the 18 man raid on my house to arrest me for leaving a court instead of being committed to a mental hospital for the criminally insane(Patton.) Details to that can be found in the dismissed in the interest of justice link, below.
But Jaqueline Montalvo's death would not just solve the big problem Gregozek and others might have in my case. Theoretically, it could send a message to all good cops to not mess with the very lucrative setup Marty Singer had with the TMU and likely many dirty cops.
This link speaks to that to some extent https://losangeleslessconfidential.wordpress.com/
This link gives more detail.
http://henypire.blogspot.com/2015/12/why-on-earth-did-hero-cop-lapd-officer.html and includes a police report where Nick Kroll shows up and where Gregozek mentions all kinds of police activity that is false. Even a false incident number and a mention of police arriving when none ever were even called much less arrived. At one point I called Gregozek yelling at him about how dare he file this for stalking when he knew Tig Notaro was lying and had never been stalked. His response: "She made me do it." My mother called him too and he said " You sued her didn't you." as the reason for his filing the charge.
The link also includes a witness list drawn up by the prosecutors before Montalvo made her intentions known- she would not be testifying for them but against them. Without talking to her or her partner they had assumed such a thing?
Fair to label Jaqueline Montalvo's death as suspicious? Without any access to any follow-up articles, I am feeling that way and it is not PLEASANT
Her blood- alcohol level was 0.18 percent – more than twice the legal limit of 0.08 percent – according to the coroner.
Deputy John Rodriguez, the traffic investigator assigned to the case, said Tuesday he didn’t know where Jacqueline Montalvo was coming from or her destination.
He said he had not yet seen the coroner’s report, and he hadn’t found any other evidence to suggest Montalvo was drunk at the time of the collision.
There was no smell of alcohol at the crash scene, Rodriguez said.
Also https://www.dailynews.com/2010/03/04/lapd-officer-killed-in-diamond-bar-crash-had-accepted-marriage-proposal-on-valentines-day/
What’s puzzling to Rodelo and investigators is why Montalvo’s car swerved on Grand Avenue near Longview Drive and collided head-on with a pickup truck.
Investigators didn’t smell alcohol in Montalvo’s car at the scene, said Deputy Russell Townsley of the Traffic Services Detail.
From other publications
She was driving her 2009 Infiniti G37 sedan north on Grand Avenue near Longview Drive when she lost control of the car, which swerved across then median into oncoming traffic.
In a statement released Tuesday night, LAPD Chief Charlie Beck said a coroner's report indicated that Montalvo was legally drunk when she died.
The Watch Commander for the LAPD Walnut area was not available to comment, but a representative, who wishes to remain anonymous, stated that most of the news about the incident is “hearsay.” During the accident, the officer “lost control of the car, driving into opposing lanes eastbound” and that was when she was “struck by two cars.”
Investigators are at a loss as to what may have caused Montalvo to swerve into incoming traffic. Deputy Russell Townsley of the Traffic Services Detail told the San Gabriel Valley Tribune that attending officers and investigators did not smell alcohol in Montalvo's car at the scene and are awaiting toxicology reports from the office of the coroner.
Given that the G37 was equipped with an electronic recorder, investigators are hoping to learn how fast the car was going at the time of collision and any insight into the car's mechanics that might explain what happened.
Rodelo is a officer with 15 years' experience with the LAPD. At the time of the accident he was stationed at the Hollywood Station, where Montalvo once worked and where the couple had met. Montalvo later moved to the LAPD Central Station, where she became a patrol officer.
Me talking: Am I wrong or would Deputy Rodriguez be able to miss the reek of alcohol with that kind of percentage? Not just Rodreguez though - Investigators plural.
He or they would be looking for that kind of thing. What did he think when he saw that coroner's report? How does her family cope with the knowledge that she died with such a dark cloud over her head? Why would her fiance Jerry Rodelo and the investigator find it so puzzling that she swerved like that since her BAC was .18? Why was Jaqueline Montalvo moved from Hollywood station after 11 years when it says she was not demoted or promoted- patrol in both places. Was that some sort of demotion? I seriously do not know. What was that anonymous source referring to when they spoke of hearsay? None can be seen online.
Why are there no follow-up articles on what was found in the investigation? NONE. We know there was an electronic recorder. We know it was puzzling to investigators and her fiance.
I should take all these questions to the DOJ or FBI but google them and Kroll and see why that seriously might get me killed or illegally jailed again. Surely her fiance or sister Tina or her many partners throughout the years, including Janelle Badar, would raise the alarm by now. Surely Rodriguez and the other investigators say something. It must be a coincidence. I truly pray it is.
The ominous call mentioned in this link(now removed. Why was it removed?) http://www.brokencountry.com/index.php/2010/05/05/off-duty-lapd-officer-jacqueline-montalvo-killed-in-diamond-bar-crash-was-drunk/Comments (17)
Jacqueline ate and drank (with a male off duty officer) for several hours at a bar in Chino Hills before she got into her car and crashed. I was there with friends. There is no conspiracy here.
📷
JR· 95 weeks ago
Jacqueline ate and then drank for several hours at a popular hot spot in Chino Hills immediately before the crash. I was there with friends. The male off-duty officer she was drinking with received the ominous phone call while still at the bar. There is no conspiracy here, just an unfortunate event.
Comments
Post a Comment