Just saw a few hits to the blog on this old post and thought it pretty much summed a lot up when it came to Nick Kroll's QUESTIONABLE career. Bares reposting here I figure. Also points out how so many "journalists" are willing to omit facts when Nick Kroll is involved. It's all so seemingly inconsequential on its face- a thirsty rotten rich kid faking it till others think he's made it might be interteresting to some to see how the son of the world's most effective fixer- Jules Kroll- operates and how journalists behave when considering the kind of employment opportunites Kroll offers. More on that here https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2010/08/a-spy-in-the-jungle/60770/ Basically it really pays to get on their good side if you are an aspiriting journalist or an aspiring anyone Tsk Tsk Cornell! You failed to mention that Jules Kroll is on your board of Trustees and that he was your Entreprenuer of the year, before this was written by Sop