The Misdemeanor of the Century

 Listened to this podcast yesterday  https://soundcloud.com/eattherichpod/ep-092-kroll Very interesting for various reasons. Told me new stuff about Kroll and also interesting to listen to these three people as they realize that something INSANE is going on with Kroll. That is the word they kept using as they dug a little deeper. They really made it clear how bullshit is Kroll's origin story but they didn't get into the problem with the press surrounding Kroll. The press not just surrounding Jules Kroll but Nick Kroll is fascinating - so many ommissions when it comes to Jules Kroll'ps work over the decades and so much hype and bullshit surrounds Nick Kroll's career that it can easily fill a book. At one point Nick's Wikipedia page talked about how he took out his penis at graduation and flashed it for all to see. Of course, that has been thoroughly scrubbed from the web.  Then there is the Cornel Sun pushing him without mentioning who his father is. Then there is th

I wanted badly to believe that news didn’t die, even when it was beaten back for so many years.  - Ronan Farrow(From his book Catch and Kill) If my hero, Jaqueline Montalvo, lived to testify what would she be able to provide the court? and potentially to the public? I can only surmise. I can guess that she could attest that Nick Kroll and Tig Notaro were lying about what occurred on April 29th 2008. She told Alissa Malzman Sterling very little according to  careerist  Malzman. Montalvo told her " I will say that no crime was committed that night and that is why I didn't even make an incident report." Sounds good for me but pretty bad for Nick Kroll, Tig Notaro, and more importantly, John Gregozek and his very odd acting elite unit.  During trial, I saw a statement made by Nick Kroll to the prosecutors(which I was never given in discovery, after the trial) where he alleged all sorts of mayhem, that there was beer bottles in our car???? So many more ugly lies that I can&#

First and foremost, cause it's easier to understand: Martin or Marty Boags is a sociopathic failson who got his father, Charles Boags, unbenched. You see young Marty was unlikable and ugly to look at when he went to Beverly Hills high school. Young Marty wanted friends so what did he do? He told them they could park anywhere they wanted or commit whatever fun infraction they wanted to and get away with it.  How would that go down? Well, Marty's father, Charles, was a judge and his dad had been letting Marty park anywhere he wants or commit who knows what crimes and get away with it. On a few occasions, Marty got three parking tickets in one day and Charles Boags gamely made them go away. In one article, Charles Boags talks of how Marty Boags lied to him and he had no clue that Marty kept parking in prohibited places.  Such was the power of judges, Marty likely told his school friends. So these Beverly Hills High brats began bringing all their tickets to Marty The rest is detail

 https://josephsonsexemplarypolicing.com/2016/06/lapd-consent-decree-2/ * This article also appeared in the February issue of the Thin Blue Line The LAPD has been under the federal Consent Decree for six years now, and has performed remarkably. We are in substantial compliance with almost all of the requirements. However, the Department still has many officers who are consumed with the minutiae of auditing and auditing and auditing. Meanwhile, the chosen federal monitor, Kroll Inc., continues to enrich itself with millions of taxpayer dollars by nitpicking items that have zero to do with public safety or police integrity. The time has come for the City to stand up and say the LAPD is done with the Consent Decree. In these tough budgetary times, the City cannot afford to waste taxpayer dollars for incessant, meaningless auditing that does nothing to enhance public safety or “reform” the LAPD. Lifting the Consent Decree will allow the LAPD to use funds for public safety the way they are