The Misdemeanor of the Century

 Twelve years ago today, a (very tragically) unsung hero lost her life. Though a team of investigators smelled no alcohol at the scene, a coroner said she was very drunk at the time of the crash. As of today the world is oblivious to what her testimony could have wrought. In short, it could have exposed a sinister conspiracy in the Los Angeles Superior court and beyond(Kroll.) Her loved ones deserve that she be remembered as an exceptionally brave person and not merely a dead drunk driver. Does justice have an expiration date? It feels like that most days but it shouldn't be the case. Please read about what Jaqueline Montalvo was willing to go against: http://alisablogq.blogspot.com/2017/07/dismissed-in-interests-of-justice.html

Had the Bar done as they should and not let him be in any position where he can further harm others I would have been spared the worst parts of this unbelievably malicious prosecution. If you google Martin Boags obituary by all indications he was smited but he must never be free to do something that deeply evil again. I know they demoted him to civil but he better not slime his way back into a position where he not only can steal someone's liberty but have them forcibly medicated because they are innocent and won't take his miserable little plea bargain. And as you'll see in the link below Martin Boags absolutely knew I was innocent and when he found out he decided to do anything to win. http://alisablogq.blogspot.com/2017/07/dismissed-in-interests-of-justice.html

So recently I've gotten a spate of twitter comments on this post  https://alisablogq.blogspot.com/2017/07/dismissed-in-interests-of-justice.html?m=1 The tweets say in so many words that they would like a more concise version. The tweets were followed by a comment to the blog saying they'd like a TL'; DR version. I learned a short while back that that meant too long, didn't read. Ok, so in maybe five minutes I came up with this so it's not as good as it can be. Yet. I plan to try and make it better and attach the appropriate documents.  I didn't do anything but go online and complain about Tig Notaro after I learned she had decided to invent destructive and possibly life ruining lies. I did it in a totally legal and non threatening way. Tig Notaro called up her good friend, Nick Kroll, to make some calls so the internet posting and the postings they inspired by others didn't end up harming her brand in any way. In order to do that, they they ...

Okay so you are a celebrity. You got yourself all famous and super successful and now you or someone else has embroiled you in a scandal.  You will not only lose everything, you will endure widespread public humiliation. Let's say you don't have any easy way out of it. Maybe you are guilty as sin and you can't rely on truth rising to the surface or any of those sweet platitudes. If you are innocent there are maybe some easy fixes. Maybe you have evidence that can clear your name before any real damage is done... But let's just focus on if you are guilty. What does the embattled celebrity or VIP do? Well, in recent weeks its been much more widely understood that you hire Marty Singer or David Bois and they verywell may hire companies like Kroll and Black Cube, but that's for another day. Let's just discuss Marty Singer for the purposes of this post: You hire Marty Singer or any attorney from his infamous firm - Lavely and Singer. Marty himself comes at a ...

http://alisablogq.blogspot.com/2017/07/dismissed-in-interests-of-justice.html

From Google:  Dismissal in the interest of justice  allows a court to dismiss a procedurally proper, but unjust or unjustifiable, cause of action. Thus,  dismissing  cases in the interest  of justice  can provide a check where few exist for overzealous prosecutions, race-based patrolling, and overuse of “three strikes” laws. "Holy shit. This is... insane..." Yes, it was. Yes, it is. Stone cold crazy. Batshit. Baying at the moon. Singing a loony tune. Straight up straight jacket stuff. "...And, yet..." he said, "it's kind of... sexy." Sexy? Only in Los Angeles, would a lawyer, perusing reams of legalese -- chronicling a then two-year journey into hell -- think, 'hey this is hot.' On the surface, he was looking at a case involving a restraining order obtained by perjury and fraud, used by an infamous L.A law firm - as a retaliatory weapon to, at first, stop first amendment protected internet postings and then as a way to sabotage a...